<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Remy Video Pokes Fun at the TSA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arlnow.com/2011/05/19/new-remy-video-pokes-fun-at-the-tsa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arlnow.com/2011/05/19/new-remy-video-pokes-fun-at-the-tsa/</link>
	<description>News, Weather, Traffic, Events and Reviews in Arlington, Virginia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:13:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.arlnow.com/2011/05/19/new-remy-video-pokes-fun-at-the-tsa/#comment-53979</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 22:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arlnow.com/?p=18795#comment-53979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d argue that most libertarians don&#039;t understand what libertarian means.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d argue that most libertarians don&#8217;t understand what libertarian means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SouthArlJD</title>
		<link>http://www.arlnow.com/2011/05/19/new-remy-video-pokes-fun-at-the-tsa/#comment-53966</link>
		<dc:creator>SouthArlJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 03:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arlnow.com/?p=18795#comment-53966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m certainly not in favor of Remy&#039;s libertarian politics, but I thought the video was hilarious and posted it on my Facebook page. I&#039;m hopeful that eventually the enthusiasm for libertarianism will subside in this country when people start finding out what it REALLY means to be so hostile to government. Everybody&#039;s against the gubmint intruding on their personal lives until they need government services or government funded infrastructure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m certainly not in favor of Remy&#8217;s libertarian politics, but I thought the video was hilarious and posted it on my Facebook page. I&#8217;m hopeful that eventually the enthusiasm for libertarianism will subside in this country when people start finding out what it REALLY means to be so hostile to government. Everybody&#8217;s against the gubmint intruding on their personal lives until they need government services or government funded infrastructure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MC</title>
		<link>http://www.arlnow.com/2011/05/19/new-remy-video-pokes-fun-at-the-tsa/#comment-53914</link>
		<dc:creator>MC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 21:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arlnow.com/?p=18795#comment-53914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am amused by how out-of-date and misinformed many commenters are about libertarianism.  Libertarians are hostile to public spending at all levels of government -- not just the federal level.  

The Cato Institute, considered one of the leading voices for libertarianism, publishes scathing attacks on public transit, claiming that private car transit is cheaper and therefore better, and that public transit is simply a waste of tax money.  Libertarians have in recent years even begun to attack the very concept of public eduction, which as always been run locally, by pushing for tax credits that can be spent at private schools. Again, the common them is that government is controlling, liberty-denying and incompetent.  To say that it is simply &quot;too big&quot; at the federal level is missing their agenda entirely.

I challenge others to cite contemporary examples of libertarians who promote spending on public transit or public education.  Good luck!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am amused by how out-of-date and misinformed many commenters are about libertarianism.  Libertarians are hostile to public spending at all levels of government &#8212; not just the federal level.  </p>
<p>The Cato Institute, considered one of the leading voices for libertarianism, publishes scathing attacks on public transit, claiming that private car transit is cheaper and therefore better, and that public transit is simply a waste of tax money.  Libertarians have in recent years even begun to attack the very concept of public eduction, which as always been run locally, by pushing for tax credits that can be spent at private schools. Again, the common them is that government is controlling, liberty-denying and incompetent.  To say that it is simply &#8220;too big&#8221; at the federal level is missing their agenda entirely.</p>
<p>I challenge others to cite contemporary examples of libertarians who promote spending on public transit or public education.  Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doodly</title>
		<link>http://www.arlnow.com/2011/05/19/new-remy-video-pokes-fun-at-the-tsa/#comment-53856</link>
		<dc:creator>doodly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 15:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arlnow.com/?p=18795#comment-53856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*  One year of naturally occurring background radiation: 300 millirem
    * Annual recommended limit to the public of radiation from man-made sources: 100 millirem
    * Chest X-ray: 10 millirem
    * Flight from New York to Los Angeles: 4 millirem
    * One day of natural background: approximately 1 millirem
    * Drinking three glasses of water a day for a year: 0.045 millirem
    * One backscatter X-ray screening: approximately 0.005 millirem

Source: Radiation dose comparisons from the Health Physics Society (http://hps.org/documents/WholeBodyScanners.pdf) and other safety experts (http://www.cbsnews.com/2300-204_162-10005685-3.html).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*  One year of naturally occurring background radiation: 300 millirem<br />
    * Annual recommended limit to the public of radiation from man-made sources: 100 millirem<br />
    * Chest X-ray: 10 millirem<br />
    * Flight from New York to Los Angeles: 4 millirem<br />
    * One day of natural background: approximately 1 millirem<br />
    * Drinking three glasses of water a day for a year: 0.045 millirem<br />
    * One backscatter X-ray screening: approximately 0.005 millirem</p>
<p>Source: Radiation dose comparisons from the Health Physics Society (<a href="http://hps.org/documents/WholeBodyScanners.pdf" >http://hps.org/documents/WholeBodyScanners.pdf</a>) and other safety experts (<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/2300-204_162-10005685-3.html" >http://www.cbsnews.com/2300-204_162-10005685-3.html</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Fontain</title>
		<link>http://www.arlnow.com/2011/05/19/new-remy-video-pokes-fun-at-the-tsa/#comment-53855</link>
		<dc:creator>John Fontain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 15:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arlnow.com/?p=18795#comment-53855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, but second link should be this...

http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/01/06/us-security-airlines-scanners-idUSTRE60553920100106]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but second link should be this&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/01/06/us-security-airlines-scanners-idUSTRE60553920100106" >http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/01/06/us-security-airlines-scanners-idUSTRE60553920100106</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doodly</title>
		<link>http://www.arlnow.com/2011/05/19/new-remy-video-pokes-fun-at-the-tsa/#comment-53854</link>
		<dc:creator>doodly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 15:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arlnow.com/?p=18795#comment-53854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great, now I&#039;m scared of bananas.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, now I&#8217;m scared of bananas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Fontain</title>
		<link>http://www.arlnow.com/2011/05/19/new-remy-video-pokes-fun-at-the-tsa/#comment-53853</link>
		<dc:creator>John Fontain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 15:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arlnow.com/?p=18795#comment-53853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to show you how ridiculous the safety claims are....

1.  Eating a banana exposes you to twice as much radiation as the backscatter x-ray machine (the other device used, the millimeter wavelength imager, does not expose you to ionizing radiation).

http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2011/02/Screen-shot-2011-02-28-at-4.04.43-PM.png

2.  The airplane that you pass through the scanner to fly on exposes you to as much radiation in every two minutes of flight as does the backscatter scanner.

http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2011/02/Screen-shot-2011-02-28-at-4.04.43-PM.png

&quot;The radiation levels are well below the threshold that could be considered a risk to an individual&#039;s health, said Dr. James Thrall of the American College of Radiology and chief of radiology at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.&quot;

If the concern is really safety, then parents shouldn&#039;t let their kids fly on airplanes because of the in-flight radiation exposure.  And they shouldn&#039;t let them eat bananas for that matter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to show you how ridiculous the safety claims are&#8230;.</p>
<p>1.  Eating a banana exposes you to twice as much radiation as the backscatter x-ray machine (the other device used, the millimeter wavelength imager, does not expose you to ionizing radiation).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2011/02/Screen-shot-2011-02-28-at-4.04.43-PM.png"  rel="lightbox[18795]">http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2011/02/Screen-shot-2011-02-28-at-4.04.43-PM.png</a></p>
<p>2.  The airplane that you pass through the scanner to fly on exposes you to as much radiation in every two minutes of flight as does the backscatter scanner.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2011/02/Screen-shot-2011-02-28-at-4.04.43-PM.png"  rel="lightbox[18795]">http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2011/02/Screen-shot-2011-02-28-at-4.04.43-PM.png</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The radiation levels are well below the threshold that could be considered a risk to an individual&#8217;s health, said Dr. James Thrall of the American College of Radiology and chief of radiology at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.&#8221;</p>
<p>If the concern is really safety, then parents shouldn&#8217;t let their kids fly on airplanes because of the in-flight radiation exposure.  And they shouldn&#8217;t let them eat bananas for that matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tabby</title>
		<link>http://www.arlnow.com/2011/05/19/new-remy-video-pokes-fun-at-the-tsa/#comment-53839</link>
		<dc:creator>Tabby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 14:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arlnow.com/?p=18795#comment-53839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless it&#039;s just a big microwave--everyone knows you can&#039;t put metal in a microwave.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless it&#8217;s just a big microwave&#8211;everyone knows you can&#8217;t put metal in a microwave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OddNumber</title>
		<link>http://www.arlnow.com/2011/05/19/new-remy-video-pokes-fun-at-the-tsa/#comment-53824</link>
		<dc:creator>OddNumber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 14:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arlnow.com/?p=18795#comment-53824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you have any actual data comparing the radiation levels of a telephone pole or iphone versus an airport scanning device?  Personally I don&#039;t think it is unreasonable to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure for young children.  I suspect that if people were better educated about the sources of radiation that they would want to consider ways to minimize it other than just avoiding airport scanners.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have any actual data comparing the radiation levels of a telephone pole or iphone versus an airport scanning device?  Personally I don&#8217;t think it is unreasonable to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure for young children.  I suspect that if people were better educated about the sources of radiation that they would want to consider ways to minimize it other than just avoiding airport scanners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dynaroo</title>
		<link>http://www.arlnow.com/2011/05/19/new-remy-video-pokes-fun-at-the-tsa/#comment-53823</link>
		<dc:creator>dynaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 13:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arlnow.com/?p=18795#comment-53823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone knows you just need some tinfoil on your head and you&#039;re fine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone knows you just need some tinfoil on your head and you&#8217;re fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>