Forums
Home > General Discussion > 4 guilty pleas in Baltimore beating of Virginia man
-
I believe he's from Arlington. As predicted this story was buried, and of course no hate crime charges . Had the roles been reversed, this would be international headlines, with hate crimes charges.
This is “justice” in America. Some people are more “deserving” of protection than others are. yet someone who shall go unnamed thinks this is somehow “equality”.
Special protections nad privileges is NOT equality.
novasteve said:
I believe he's from Arlington. As predicted this story was buried, and of course no hate crime charges . Had the roles been reversed, this would be international headlines, with hate crimes charges.
No it wouldn't, because there was no evidence of motivation due to hate.
Have you seen the video? Tons of blatent racial overtones. And even if nothing was said, if it had been 4 white folks in Arlington kicking and robbing a drunk black guy in front of Mister Days on video, you know it would be pushed as a hate crime in the media and in the courts.
This story was all over the press when it broke it wasn't buried at all.
But steve is right – Al and Jesse would have been all over it if it was whitey doing the punching.
LMAO at the sentences imposed on these thugs.
dynaroo said:
novasteve said:
I believe he’s from Arlington. As predicted this story was buried, and of course no hate crime charges . Had the roles been reversed, this would be international headlines, with hate crimes charges.
No it wouldn’t, because there was no evidence of motivation due to hate.
:rolleyes:
Right. I'm sure if 4 whites guys beat up a black guy you'd be saying “no evidence of hate”
So why did they beat him up? are you saying they liked him? No evidence of hate?
Westover said:
Have you seen the video? Tons of blatent racial overtones. And even if nothing was said, if it had been 4 white folks in Arlington kicking and robbing a drunk black guy in front of Mister Days on video, you know it would be pushed as a hate crime in the media and in the courts.
THOUGHT CRIME
Liberals will throw a hissy fit and go back into guilt and denial mode. Only whites can be racists.
dynaroo said:
novasteve said:
I believe he's from Arlington. As predicted this story was buried, and of course no hate crime charges . Had the roles been reversed, this would be international headlines, with hate crimes charges.
No it wouldn't, because there was no evidence of motivation due to hate.
One time can you please watch/read something before declaring it wrong?
These guys deserve double what they were sentenced, especially those “sentenced to time served”.
dynaroo said:
No it wouldn't, because there was no evidence of motivation due to hate.
I personally believe the attack was racially motivated.
That said, I don't agree with hate crimes legislation, and think it should be in the hands of the judge to deliver an appropriate sentence taking into account all factors in a Crime. By inventing these automatic multipliers or triple word scores or whatever, we only create protected classes that further deepen the divide among different groups of citizens.
Rick said:
One time can you please watch/read something before declaring it wrong?He doesn't need to watch it. Dynaroo/mehoo/drax/whoever is ALWAYS on the side of criminality.
It's part of his Progressive ideals.
Westover said:
Have you seen the video? Tons of blatent racial overtones.
I did see it, but I don't remember hearing that. Maybe it was there though.
And even if nothing was said, if it had been 4 white folks in Arlington kicking and robbing a drunk black guy in front of Mister Days on video, you know it would be pushed as a hate crime in the media and in the courts.
I don't “know” that and neither do you. Nor does it matter. The issue is this particular incident. If it was racial, it should be prosecuted as such.
Sounds like there was a plea deal that avoided it.
KalashniKEV said:
Rick said:
One time can you please watch/read something before declaring it wrong?He doesn't need to watch it. Dynaroo/mehoo/drax/whoever is ALWAYS on the side of criminality.
It's part of his Progressive ideals.
Again, you'll have to imagine my response because this board is moderated. Whatever you imagine, triple it and you'll be in the ballpark.
Razbo Oscar said:
This story was all over the press when it broke it wasn’t buried at all.
But steve is right – Al and Jesse would have been all over it if it was whitey doing the punching.
LMAO at the sentences imposed on these thugs.
Well it technically isn't buried, but it remains local only. Had the roles been reversed it would be national headlines.
It's just like why the Trayvon Martin story is international. I've even read about it in the German media. But the opposite happened with Daniel Adkins, who was hispanic, mentally retarded, who got shot and killed in a Taco Bell drive thru by a black man who was claiming self defense, claimed that Adkins was attacking him with a pipe when all he was holding was a dog leash. Very few people have even heard of the story, and the only “national” news it has gotten was one CNN article, and his parents pleading for an arrest, and even the left won't pick up the story (though huffpo) did solely to attack SYG laws, not to mention that this was trayvon in reverse, yet no attention, no sharptons and jacksons out demanding justice… Just forgotten.
Note they leave out the races, while the entire Trayvon coverage focused on the races.
Reminder, how long was it that Zimmerman wasn't arrested for after he shot Trayvon? 2-3 weeks? It's been 3+ months since Adkins has been killed, still no arrest, yet Trayvon wasn't mentally retarded, yet Trayvon wasn't in a taco bell drive thru, how many people fear for their lives in a drive thru with someone walking a dog? If anything, this story is WORSE than the trayvon shooting, get it's getting totally ignored due to politically correct forces.
novasteve said:
dynaroo said:
novasteve said:
I believe he's from Arlington. As predicted this story was buried, and of course no hate crime charges . Had the roles been reversed, this would be international headlines, with hate crimes charges.
No it wouldn't, because there was no evidence of motivation due to hate.
:rolleyes:
Right. I'm sure if 4 whites guys beat up a black guy you'd be saying “no evidence of hate”
You don't know what I'd say. Only I know what I'd say.
So why did they beat him up? are you saying they liked him? No evidence of hate?
Wow, so now we can simply presume it's a hate crime without evidence other than the races of the people involved? Isn't that exactly what you were complaining about while starting this thread?
Did you really go to law school? I'm starting to doubt it. Was it online?
dynaroo said:
novasteve said:
dynaroo said:
novasteve said:
I believe he’s from Arlington. As predicted this story was buried, and of course no hate crime charges . Had the roles been reversed, this would be international headlines, with hate crimes charges.
No it wouldn’t, because there was no evidence of motivation due to hate.
:rolleyes:
Right. I’m sure if 4 whites guys beat up a black guy you’d be saying “no evidence of hate”
You don’t know what I’d say. Only I know what I’d say.
So why did they beat him up? are you saying they liked him? No evidence of hate?
Wow, so now we can simply presume it’s a hate crime without evidence other than the races of the people involved? Isn’t that exactly what you were complaining about while starting this thread?
Did you really go to law school? I’m starting to doubt it. Was it online?
Do you have anything other than personal attacks?
Can you provide me an example of a crime that isn't based in hate other than some compassional mercy killing that violates the laws?
So I can hate you dynaroo for being a democrat, a yankees fan, for liking ohio state, for wearing flip flpps and if I beat you up, that's somehow less bad than if I beat you up because you are gay or asian or have HIV or whatever is a protected catergory?
Say if you got killed, do you think the defendant charged with killing you should face less of a penalty because he hated you because of what you wore or your political views than if he killed you over your race of sexual orientation? Why not treat it all the same? Why are some people more worthy of protection than others?
KalashniKEV said:
dynaroo said:
No it wouldn't, because there was no evidence of motivation due to hate.
I personally believe the attack was racially motivated.
I do too. Personally
I don't go around convicting people of crimes based on my personal beliefs though. You would, but not me. I believe in basic American values like innocent until proven guilty and stuff.
That said, I don't agree with hate crimes legislation
Look at you, on the side of criminality.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
