Home > General Discussion > Armed march across Memorial Bridge… what could possibly go wrong?

Armed march across Memorial Bridge… what could possibly go wrong?
  • novasteve May 15, 2013 - 9:49 am #73407 Reply

    In the 1970s the scientists were 100% convinced the earth was cooling. Now they are 100% convinced it was cooling. We were all also supposed to die from the killer bees by the 1980s. remember? This is a discussion on climate change now? The only reason why I brought up climate change was to prove liberals have no issue denying reality. I brought up multiple examples, climate change was just one of them. The actual topic is gun rights, and denial of reality is relevant because you have liberals either lying or denying reality about firearms. Like calling an nAR-15 an automatic weapon. Saying that an AR-15 is an actual military weapon that only belongs on the battle field. Calling things that have a precisde meaning like assault weapons, something that they are not. That’s why I brought up other examples of where liberals do the same thing .

    Captain_Obvious May 15, 2013 - 9:55 am #73411 Reply

    So because a few people say things publicly about something, that must mean a whole group of people also feel the same way ?  I know, its easier to just lump people into 1 category right ?  Less confusion that way and no way you can deny reality.

    novasteve May 15, 2013 - 9:57 am #73413 Reply

    You’re wrong. They are making a giant push to force people to deny reality. Another example is now liberal groups are pushing to allow gay men to donate blood. Despite there being a huge epidemic of HIV in the MSM community. 2% of the population is 61% of HIV infections according to the CDC. Take into account also that it takes at least TWO weeks and up to 6 months for HIV to show up in a blood test. But that’s not stopping liberal groups for demanding the prohibition stop despite it being about SAFETY. If it were some bigotry thing they would ban lesbians, but that would be idiotic since they are probably the lowest risk group. But feel good pC moment is more important than safety.  Deny reality, pretend there’s no risk,a nd then put people at risk so you can have a feel good moment. Brilliant.

    Captain_Obvious May 15, 2013 - 10:02 am #73416 Reply

    ok, so I’ve asked fairly simple, legit questions and you dodge them to rant about something else again.  Please go back and read your last few posts, cause none of them follow each other in any way.

    Are you trying to turn this forum into a version of “PTI” ?

    novasteve May 15, 2013 - 10:06 am #73417 Reply

    MY POINT IS, how am I supposed to trust liberals and their opinions of things when they completely twist and deny reality to get their goals accomplished? These are MAINSTREAM liberal views.


    You still have liberals claiminig that straight men are just as likely to get HIV as gay men are. That’s called denying reality. Why should I trust anything they do when there are political motivations behind everything they do?

    Captain_Obvious May 15, 2013 - 10:17 am #73424 Reply

    I hate to break this to you, but you also twist and deny reality to get YOUR goals accomplished.

    I’m gonna try to break this down for you in very simple terms.  Every political party does things with political motivations to get their goals accomplished…no really, Republicans do too.  If you don’t understand that, then you truly don’t understand politics.

    novasteve May 15, 2013 - 10:22 am #73430 Reply



    Democrats are much bigger into denying reality with BIGGER consequences. Are you guys really prepared to put the blood network at risk just for a feel good moment? What will you tell someone who goets infected?

    Oh, did you know leftist groups are also pushing to decriminalize the KNOWING transmission of HIV to others?



    Captain_Obvious May 15, 2013 - 10:27 am #73433 Reply

    you are so lost as a person.  good luck to you in the future.

    novasteve May 15, 2013 - 10:30 am #73434 Reply

    Wow, that’s such a wonderful response to my points.




    What good will come of decriminalize non disclosure of HIV status?


    Captain_Obvious May 15, 2013 - 11:41 am #73466 Reply

    Let Canada deal with this…SINCE THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT CANADA !

    Dezlboy May 15, 2013 - 2:16 pm #73500 Reply

    Novasteve, when you were a small boy, by any chance were you molested by a liberal?

    KalashniKEV May 15, 2013 - 9:19 pm #73584 Reply

    What ever happened to Reggie Love?

    Does he still work for Obama?

    Do you think they ever go for a Larry Sinclair limo ride with Jay-Z, Tiger, and Clooney once in a while?

    Dezlboy May 15, 2013 - 10:11 pm #73585 Reply

    Reggie Love stopped working for Obama about four (?) months ago. As for “Larry Sinclair limo ride with Jay-Z, Tiger, and Clooney” I have to plead ignorance.  (but , just this once!).  :-)

    Dezlboy May 15, 2013 - 10:17 pm #73586 Reply

    @novasteve, in a life or death emergency, would you rather get a blood transfusion from a gay man who hasn’t had sex in six years, or from a straight man who visits prostitutes every other week?   Both person’s blood would of course be tested for HIV.

    Simple question.  (A) Gay man with no sex for six years.  (B) Straight man who visits hookers every other week.  A or B ?


    hughjassphd May 16, 2013 - 7:40 am #73590 Reply

    What they should bring is giant puppets.

    Because nothing says take me seriously like giant puppets.

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.


Subscribe to our mailing list