Novasteve, I’m sure we could all speculate and come up with plausible and implausible reasons why a description wasn’t released. Perhaps there have been several similar crimes with dissimilar suspects and they didn’t know which description to go with. Implausible, but not impossible. Perhaps the suspects were German dignitaries and ACPD wanted to avoid an international incident. Implausible, but possible. Perhaps the suspects threatened to expose the identity of Batman if their descriptions were released. Implausible, but awesome. I don’t know. But I wouldn’t automatically jump to, yep there goes our local police department getting all politically correct again.
Steve, I’m pretty sure most of us don’t feel very safe knowing you have a firearm.
Most of you are liberals who don’t know the first thing about guns or gun safety. I showed a liberal friend of mine pictures of two bullets, one was a 7.62x54R and the other was .223 and I asked him if he had ban one, which one would he ban (without telling him the names). and he picked the 7.62x54R because it is both larger caliber, taller, and thus holds more gunpowder, and is more powerful. I then told him the one he didn’t want to ban was a .223, the same kind used in Newtown. he went nuts, saying I was trying to trick him, and that of course he wanted to ban the .223.
When presented with a photo, he wanted to ban the one that look scarier. That’s what liberals do, because what they do on guns is based on complete and total ignorance about guns. And yes, he calls magazines “clips”. He also supports barrel shroud bans too. When I asked him why, he couldn’t explain, just like Feinstein couldn’t. When I informed him that a barrel shroud is meant to protect your skin from being burned by a hot barrel, he quickly changed the subject to “you must agree with me, or you hate children”
Why are you allowed to post this stuff? The above post should be deleted. Has NOTHING to do with the topic at hand and is the very definition of trolling.
My point was to show that many of the anti gun people there are completely ignorant about firearms. Does ignorance form a good basis for making policies about something?
This isn’t an anti gun thread. What are you talking about ? And that’s not your point in this case. Your point is to further your agenda here since you post this crap over and over.
Steve, I'm pretty sure most of us don't feel very safe knowing you have a firearm”
Captain_Obvious, I notice you neglected to mention that the comment I was replying to had nothing to do with the topic and was a thinly veiled personal attack. WHy doesn’t that upset you?
Steve, darling, there was nothing veiled about my comment.
Because you continually break the rules here and claim others personally attack you which is false.
So, that wasn’t a personal attack captain obvious? What was hank saying w hen he said his statement? What was he implying about me that he said that many of the people here probably don’t feel safe knowing that I have a firearm?
No, cause he doesn’t know you personally, does he?
Just stop breaking the rules here and demanding others to follow the rules at the same time…
Actually, that’s not quite true. Novasteve and I know each other quite well through the Arlington Bear Community.
Mods need to do a better job moderating these threads to keep trolls from pushing conversations off-topic.
Godd@mnit, Steve, now look what you’ve done! Now mom’s all mad at us.
Very clear example oabout the ingorance I’m referring to. Should someone that ignorant about an issue be proposing legislation on said issue?
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.