How much revenue does the board expect this to pull in? What will the money be used for?
Some breeds of dog make better pets than others. Consider their temperament and needs before choosing, and your ability to meet them. Don’t get a dog that needs lots of exercise, for instance, if you don’t have a yard or live near a dog park.
Good morning Steve!
I’m not sure. What about YOU? How much revenue does the board expect this to pull in? What will the money be used for?
I would expect there to be anywhere between no revenue to some revenue. Also the money will probably be used for something, hopefully in Arlington.
A relatively new type of adjustable leg has been adopted from the European cabinet system which offers several advantages. First off, in making base cabinets for kitchens, the cabinet sides would be cut to 34½ inches, yielding four cabinet side blanks per 4 foot by 8 foot sheet. Using the adjustable feet, the side blanks are cut to 30 inches, thus yielding six cabinet side per sheet. These feet can be secured to the bottom of the cabinet by having the leg base screwed onto the cabinet bottom. They can also be attached by means of a hole drilled through the cabinet bottom at specific locations. The legs are then attached to the cabinet bottom by a slotted, hollow machine screw. The height of the cabinet can be adjusted from inside the cabinet, simply by inserting a screwdriver into the slot and turning to raise or lower the cabinet. The holes in the cabinet are capped by plastic inserts, making the appearance more acceptable for residential cabinets. Using these feet, the cabinets need not be shimmed or scribed to the floor for leveling. The toe kick board is attached to the cabinet by means of a clip, which is either screwed onto the back side of the kick board, or a barbed plastic clip is inserted into a saw kerf, also made on the back side of the kick board. This toe kick board can be made to fit each base cabinet, or made to fit a run of cabinets.
Yes, I think there could be revenue generated from speeding tickets. This revenue will probably be in U.S. dollars, and paid mostly by check or credit card. I also speculate that it will go to the County and spent on stuff, like they do with tax revenue and revenue from other criminal and traffic fines. That spending will also probably be in U.S. dollars. The tickets will probably be handed out by police officers.
More questions, steve?
It is estimated that the lower speed limits will raise $4,500 in collected fines by calendar year end. The funds will be distributed thusly: 45% to general transporation fund, 25% to general Arl Co expenses, 15% to school system, %15 to homeless shelters.
It is estimated that next calendar will bring in less funds (pro-rated) due to better compliance. If the revenue drops by 10% in the third year, the Co Board may according to current regulations (laws?) consider raising the traffic fine.
I hardly ever see anyone pulled over on Clarendon and Wilson Blvds. Also, the traffic is so congested most of the time that people rarely go fast anyways.
This doesn’t sound like a revenue generating move. It’s more of a safety move that will generate very little revenue for Arlington.
If they wanted to generate revenue, they could pull a DC and lower the speed limit on 66 to 40 mph and then setup speed cams. What a freakin’ joke that is.
So if there is so much traffic and people can’t go that fast anyways, why waste the time to lower it and the expense of putting up new signs? The only reason why there are no speedcams in Arlington is becausce Richmond won’t allow it. Thank God.
So if there is so much traffic and people can't go that fast anyways, why claim it’s about revenue, and why whine about it on comment board?
@NS, per 8 July ARLnow article, “The Department of Environmental Services conducted studies…. Information was gathered regarding factors such as vehicle speeds, collisions, traffic volumes, pedestrian and bicyclist activity and development patterns.”
Thus, apparently there are times when excessive speed lead to collisions with cars, pedestrians, and bicyclists. And, even if heavy traffic forces a driver to limit their speed, there will always be drivers who weave in and out of lanes at unsafe speeds.
The lowering of speeds is to increase safety. The signs will pay for themselves.
@sansabelt wrote, “…why claim it's about revenue, and why whine about it on comment board?”
novasteve in training replies, “we didn’t need 25 mph limits when I was a kid. We knew to stay out of the street. What’s wrong with parents these day? They coddle their kids and turn them into whimps! And meanwhile the liberals love it because lowering the speed allows the government to intrude into our lifes. Liberals only complain when it affects others! Stop denying reality.
It seems to me that most of the people that tend to complain about speed cameras, speed limits, etc. are people who are habitual speeders and thus violators of the laws. I’ve been driving for 15 years and have only received one speeding ticket, which I went to court for and was able to get repealed.
I’m not trying to brag or anything, I’m just saying it really isn’t rocket science. Avoid going more than 15 over the limit on a highway, 50 in a 40 zone, and over 30 in residential neighborhood and you will be just fine.
I’ve been driving since 1991 and I’ve been pulled over once and got my only speeding ticket that time for doing 67 in a 65 in Ohio. in Fact, the Michigan attorney general at the time said that you shouldn’t pay these tickets because they were targetting only out of state drivers and there was a big fight in the mid 1990s about this thing. So my only speeding ticket was basically because I was a non resident being targetting most likely. If speed cams were about safety, then why start them at 1 mph over the limit in DC? That could easily be within the margin of era. it’s about revenues. That’s why they put them on commuter routes, put them at the bottom of hills, etc.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.