And then the troll, realizing he’s going to get his ass ground into the pavement if he sticks around, runs away like a scared widdle puppy.
It’s okay, when you come back to troll more we’ll be here waiting.
While you’re gone, why don’t you go bow to Cooch, the master of your genitals?
this threads about johnsons and willies and birth control.....go start your own thread.
Go play with your johnsons and willies while it’s still legal.
So to recap, Mr. Steve posts an article about a prominent Virginia politician possibly violating the law through his businesses, and everyone shifted the blame to republicans, and then steve, and then birth control. I saw one open and honest reaction to the topic at hand. Thanks @dezlboy, despite blueberry ranting.
I think this won’t be as big of a talking point as the current administrations gifting debacle will be, but it should be discussed. If you haven’t read the Grasserly letter and emails, it’s worth a read.
“and everyone shifted the blame to republicans, and then steve, and then birth control”
No, that’s not what happened at all. Read it again.
How is questioning Cuccinelli’s anti-science campaign at tax payer expense and support for anti-cruelty a “dishonest” response to someone offering support for the man based on the article in the post that started this?
@Rick, thanks for the compliment. And, I’ll try to keep my blueberries tucked safely in my pants!
-rebuttal that republicans are already in a scandal (not relevant to discussion)
-ns bashing (not relevant to discussion)
-sexual harassment comeback (not relevant to discussion)
-Blueberries, 60′s music ((not relevant to discussion)
-Short summary of case by @johnnyb (reasonably relevant)
-@dezlboy with a relevant response
-A @halj rebuttal about the anti-science bonfire Richmond is lighting (what?)
-@sansabelt going for a reproductive rights shot
-@halj saying Cuccinelli supports cockfighting, where the actual truth is he did not support strengthening existing penalties (not defending him, just stating what actually happened) (irrelevant)
-@johnnyb back and forth
-@halj saying I need to re-read what happened.
-A thank-you from @dezlboy.
Looks like I got everything.
My last post was blocked (contained a four letter word associating bat excrement and Cooch). In any case, my reply was in response to Johnny B’s support for Cooch, support that appears to be based in part on the material in the article in the first post in this thread. If challenging that support with things like anti-science, pro-animal cruelty, anti-gay, pro-drunk-concealed-weapons, etc. offends you – too bad. Cooch would be very bad for VA. Try to keep everyone’s focus on Citizen’s United propaganda – it’s not going to work.
Well I’m glad to see it’s not just me being blocked….
BTW, this forum was a lot more fun b4 January and May of this year.
Way too serious.
Fine @halj. We’re talking about Terry McAuliffe in this post, not Johnny B. Why are you so angry you’re resorting to swearing?
FYI: I’ve found that sometimes i hit submit and message doesn’t post. I think it may be a glitch, not a matter of blocking.
@johhny b, what happened in Jan and/or May? Or just happenstance?
Just a little riddle to solve.
Get it right and I’ll buy ya some macaroons.
FYI: I've found that sometimes i hit submit and message doesn't post. I think it may be a glitch, not a matter of blocking.
I thought that at first, but then tested with re-worded sentences…..whenever I referenced a certain politician it was blocked. Even when I didn’t use his name!
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.