Editor’s Note: This sponsored column is written by Mathew B. Tully of Tully Rinckey PLLC, an Arlington firm that specializes in federal employment and labor law, security clearance proceedings, and military law.
Q. My federal agency has proposed my removal, but I know other people who got away with a 90-day suspension for the same misconduct. Can agencies do that?
A. Generally, similarly situated employees should not receive disparate penalties for similar misconduct. The penalty previously imposed on similarly situated employees is one of the 12 so-called mitigating “Douglas factors” that deciding officials should weigh when deciding on discipline. However, not all employees – even those who hold the same title – are similar. Years of experience and prior misconduct could differentiate them. Further, not all types of misconduct – even when the charges go by the same name – are equal.
Traditionally, the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) had held that employees were not deemed similarly situated if they did not share the same supervisor and work unit. Consequently, the Board considered these factors to be “outcome determinative,” it noted in Joe Lewis Jr. v. Department of Veterans Affairs (2010). However, prompted by a U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision, the Board in Lewis adopted what it called a more “flexible approach” under which employees could be deemed similarly situated even though they did not share the same work unit or supervisor.
In fact, the Board in Rasheed Dennis v. Department of Housing and Urban Development (2013) identified factors that are “relevant considerations, but none of them is a threshold requirement or outcome determinative in a disparate penalty analysis.” These factors include: 1. “whether a comparative employee worked in the same organizational unit, had the same supervisor and/or deciding official”; 2. “whether the events occurred relatively closely in time;” 3. “whether the difference in treatment was knowing and intentional”; 4. “whether an agency began levying a more severe penalty for a certain offense without giving notice of a change in policy”; and 5. “whether an imposed penalty is appropriate for the sustained charge(s).”
If the employee, with the help of a federal employment law attorney, manages to establish himself or herself as similarly situated to comparators who received more lenient punishments, the agency then must provide a legitimate explanation for the penalty disparities.
Federal employees who are facing discipline for alleged misconduct should immediately contact a federal employment law attorney who can represent them in the agency’s misconduct investigation, reply to proposed discipline, and/or prepare and litigate their MSPB appeal. Depending on the circumstances, an attorney can show the agency failed to properly consider penalties meted out to similarly situated comparators, it treated similarly situated employees more leniently, or its explanation for the different penalties is not legitimate.
Mathew B. Tully is the founding partner of Tully Rinckey PLLC. Located in Arlington, Va. and Washington, D.C., Tully Rinckey PLLC’s attorneys practice criminal defense, matrimonial and family law, federal employment law, and military law. To speak with an attorney, call 703-525-4700 or to learn more visit fedattorney.com.
The views and opinions expressed in the column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of ARLnow.com.
Tour Country Club Hills to discover its lush herbage, mature trees, and the Victorian and frame houses of the area in Neighborhood Spotlight.
A soggy weekend is on tap after an otherwise pretty nice final week of September. Obviously this week’s big story was the devastation in Florida, the huge scale of which…
Share your input on the Arlington Forestry and Natural Resources Plan by October 3.
A proposed bridge for bicyclists and pedestrians between Crystal City and the Southwest Waterfront area of D.C. has received $20 million in federal funding to move forward. When complete, the…
9th Street Chamber Music is back in business for its second season! 9SCM is disrupting the stereotypes of classical music as stuffy, dry, and elite through dynamic yet accessible performances and its one-of-a-kind String Quartet Intensive for young musicians in the DC Metro area.[9th Street Quartet](https://www.9thstreetchambermusic.com/9th-street- quartet)’s first concert is on Sunday, October 16 at 4:00 PM. The group will offer, for the first time, a ‘Playlist Shuffle’ themed concert featuring single movements of string quartet favorites. Tickets for this concert can be found here, and are $20 for adults and FREE for all students under 18.
Rehearsals began Monday, September 27 for the String Quartet Intensive, welcoming 32 new and returning members to the program. These talented musicians in grades 7 through 12 represent over fifteen area schools throughout Northern Virginia, DC and Maryland, and are an integral part of the growing 9SCM community. Their first performance will take place on Monday, November 28 at 7:30 PM.
Now you can have fun with your family and friends when deciding where to eat!
Just hop aboard The Lunch Train and set the destination for: breakfast, brunch, lunch, dinner, or nightlife!
– No app necessary. Simply go to the website if you’d like!
– No account necessary
– Use your current location or a desired location
– Add restaurants you’re interested in, invite your friends, and play the game!
Join us as we explore Vini Franchetti & their two sister vineyards Passopisciaro (Sicily) and Vini Franchetti (Tuscany) for our Sicily/Tuscany Wine Dinner!
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 6pm
Special Guest: This wine dinner we will be hosting the wine maker