Each week, “Just Reduced” spotlights properties in Arlington County whose price have been cut over the previous week. The market summary is crafted by Arlington Realty, Inc. Maximize your real estate investment with the team by visiting www.arlingtonrealtyinc.com or calling 703-836-6000 today!

Please note: While Arlington Realty, Inc. provides this information for the community, it may not be the listing company of these homes.

As of October 13, there are 210 detached homes, 54 townhouses and 244 condos for sale throughout Arlington County. In total, 44 homes experienced a price reduction in the past week, including:

6223 Langston Boulevard

Please note that this is solely a selection of Just Reduced properties available in Arlington County. For a complete list of properties within your target budget and specifications, contact Arlington Realty, Inc.


This recurring Real Estate feature is sponsored by The Eli Residential Team. Their mission is to guide, educate, and advocate for their clients through real advice, hands-on support, and personalized service. This week’s post is written by Carolanne Korolowicz.

In Arlington, the contention between urban development and environmental preservation is ever present. Citizens went to bat to save Arlington’s tree canopy during the Missing Middle debacle, there are environment-focus ballot measures almost every election, and plenty of local associations with a mission to preserve the county’s green landscape. But, did you know that debating over trees is actually an Arlington tradition? Before boundaries were even drawn, trees have been at the center of almost every development project.

On October 21, 1767, the stage was set by John Carlyle and Charles Alexander. The two prominent figures went to trial to dispute whose land (modern day Arlington and Alexandria City) was whose. Twenty-four witnesses gave their testimonies about the land boundaries defined by tree markers. Many of these witnesses were quoted mentioning the trees’ ages, whether they had been marked as line or corner trees, and the type of instrument used. With tree-defined boundary lines, the testimonies became a source of confusion rather than clarity.

In other historical accounts, it is clear that the DC-area forefathers viewed trees as part of the area’s heritage. A friend of Thomas Jefferson wrote, “Nothing affected Mr. Jefferson like this wanton destruction of the fine trees scattered over the (Federal) City grounds.” The friend also stated that Jefferson himself once said, “The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder.” As obvious by these statements, the conservation cause has always been one of great passion.

(A part of George Washington’s Oak Tree Displayed at The Glencarlyn Library, Photo: ArlingtonHistorical.com)

The acknowledgement of prominent trees has been documented over the centuries. George Washington’s survey oak in Glencarlyn being one of the first. Later in 1860, a large, anciently marked poplar tree was noted to be a landmark for the Cherrydale Neighborhood, but was cut down for the Washington and Old Dominion Railway in 1912. George Nicholas Saegmuller, an original owner of “Reserve Hill”– today’s Knights of Columbus Arlington Headquarters– planted a strip of evergreen forest from LIttle Falls Road to Old Dominion Drive as a homage to his homeland of Germany. Most importantly, the first tree to be given protection was one of the oldest oak trees of the Nation at the Grunwell Estate, located in Country Club Hills, in the late 19th century.

(A Champion Ash tree in Barcroft Park being measured, Photo: Arlington County)

Citizens acting as stewards of wildlife are deeply rooted in the makeup of Arlington. This symbiotic relationship remains today through the Forest and Natural Resources Commission’s Notable Tree Nominations. Since 1987, the volunteer-led program has awarded over 400 significant trees and their caregivers. In 2024, eleven trees were selected, including four on Fort CF Smith, six in North Arlington and one located on the corner of Columbia Pike and George Mason Drive. Though not legally protected, the status has proved helpful when communicating the importance of conservation during development projects.

What makes for a notable tree? The committee looks for these three items: size, neighborhood value, and uniqueness. Nominations are due every year on October 31st – so it’s not too late to submit! For legal protection, an application must be submitted for a ‘Specimen Tree’ through the Trees and Shrubs Ordinance. This designation requires tree conservation and protection if development of a site occurs. Violations result in a civil penalty of up to $2,500. Applications are due September 30th every year.

(A 2024 Notable Tree Winner: Deodar Cedar on Fort CF Smith, Photo: Arlington County)

As headbutting between developers and “tree-huggers” continues on, Arlington County has made efforts in favor of the area’s ecosystem over the decades. The citizens hold the power to improve these protections. Nominating trees for significance, or legal protection, is the easiest way to make a difference.

To quote the late local historian Eleanor Lee Templeman, “Although Arlington County has already lost a great deal of its forests through careless development of subdivisions, an awakened public concern over this priceless heritage will save a great deal of remaining beauty. Our stream valleys and palisades still possess true wilderness areas which must be preserved for posterity.” (Arlington Heritage: Vignettes of a Virginia County, 1959)


This sponsored column is by Law Office of James Montana PLLC. All questions about it should be directed to James Montana, Esq., Janice Chen, Esq., and Victoria Khaydar, Esq., practicing attorneys at The Law Office of James Montana PLLC, an immigration-focused law firm located in Falls Church, Virginia. The legal information given here is general in nature. If you want legal advice, contact us for an appointment.

As we’ve repeatedly written, the Trump Administration has a resource scarcity problem – it simply does not have the detention beds and transportation facilities to deport as many migrants as it wishes. Moreover, it does not have enough immigration judges to handle the pending immigration docket, which still has nearly four million pending cases. Recruiting and training new immigration judges takes time. Time is a luxury for the Trump Administration, which senses (we believe) that it has a limited window of opportunity to implement its agenda. So, what to do? The subject of this advertorial is the Administration’s latest idea: combing the Pentagon for lawyers and slotting them into immigration judge roles. For now, the Administration is just relaxing the rules and asking for ‘volunteers.’ But hundreds of military immigration judges may be coming soon to courthouses near you.

First, a brief backgrounder on immigration judges. Immigration Judges are not Article 3 judges, appointed with Senate approval and given life tenure. Instead, Immigration Judges are Article 1 officials – administrative law judges, in DC parlance – who work within the Department of Justice as civil servants. Presidents can (and do) fire or reassign immigration judges; President Trump has been more energetic than most of his predecessors in both hiring and firing.

Presidents of both parties have worked to expand the ranks of immigration judges. Over the past decade, the number almost tripled, from 250 to 735, before the firings and reassignments at the beginning of the current Presidential term pushed the number below 700 again.

(more…)


 

This article is sponsored by the Arlington Economic Development Business Investment Group.

This month, DC Startup & Tech Week (DCSTW) marks its 10th anniversary, celebrating a decade of entrepreneurship, collaboration and innovation across the D.C., Maryland and Virginia tech ecosystem. The annual event, running Oct. 20–24, 2025, will once again unite thousands of founders, investors and innovators for a week of sessions, workshops and networking opportunities.

This milestone year carries special significance for Arlington. On Thursday, Oct. 23, for the second time, DCSTW will host a full day of programming in Arlington. This year will take place at Amazon’s HQ2 in Arlington’s National Landing — a symbolic nod to the region’s rise as a global innovation hub.

The day is sponsored by Arlington Economic Development (AED), which worked with DCSTW to bring programming to Arlington. The partnership underscores Arlington’s growing role as a magnet for startups, investors and enterprises driving the future of technology, defense and artificial intelligence.

“Celebrating our 10th anniversary at Amazon HQ2 in Arlington is a defining moment that showcases the DMV’s transformation into a thriving epicenter of innovation globally — and this is only the beginning,” said Rachel Koretsky, co-founder and co-chair of DCSTW. “By bringing together the brightest entrepreneurs, boldest investors, and most passionate builders from across D.C., Maryland, and Virginia, we’re proving that when our region unites, we don’t just compete with other ecosystems — we redefine what’s possible.”

Thursday at Amazon HQ2: Panels that Define the DMV Advantage

Thursday’s sessions at HQ2 will spotlight why the DMV has become one of the nation’s most dynamic places to build and scale a company.

At 10:10 a.m., the first panel, held on the Merlin Large Main Stage, will explore why founders are choosing to build and grow in the DMV region. Moderated by Matt Gittleman of VC in DC, the discussion will feature Gerald Kierce of Trustible, Ivan Jackson of WriteHuman.ai, and Haley Bryant of Hustle Fund. Together, they’ll examine what sets the region apart for startups — from its deep talent pool and access to federal partners to a growing network of investors and accelerators.

At 1:45 p.m., don’t miss “The $100B Defense Tech Opportunity: Why AI & Autonomous Startups Are Winning in the DMV.” Moderated by AWS Defense, the discussion will feature Blake Souter of AeroVironment, Christian Seifert of Forterra and Dr. Jenny McArdle of Helsing, among others. The session will examine how the DMV’s defense and intelligence ecosystem is fueling breakthroughs in AI, autonomy and dual-use technologies.

Arlington’s Moment

For Arlington, hosting DCSTW’s 10th anniversary reflects its growing influence in the region’s innovation economy. We hope you’ll join us as Arlington takes center stage during D.C.’s biggest week for entrepreneurs.

Tickets for DC Startup & Tech Week are available at dcstw.com. Attendees can receive 20% off with the promo code AED20OFF.


Each week, “Just Reduced” spotlights properties in Arlington County whose price have been cut over the previous week. The market summary is crafted by Arlington Realty, Inc. Maximize your real estate investment with the team by visiting www.arlingtonrealtyinc.com or calling 703-836-6000 today!

Please note: While Arlington Realty, Inc. provides this information for the community, it may not be the listing company of these homes.

As of October 6, there are 205 detached homes, 52 townhouses and 245 condos for sale throughout Arlington County. In total, 44 homes experienced a price reduction in the past week, including:

2119 21st Road N

Please note that this is solely a selection of Just Reduced properties available in Arlington County. For a complete list of properties within your target budget and specifications, contact Arlington Realty, Inc.


This recurring Real Estate feature is sponsored by The Eli Residential Team. Their mission is to guide, educate, and advocate for their clients through real advice, hands-on support, and personalized service. This week’s post is written by Val Connolly

When it comes to buying in Arlington, the options are exciting, and a little overwhelming! Do you picture yourself in a fully updated home, where modern kitchens, bathrooms, fixtures, and even new construction mean you can move in tomorrow with zero hassle? Or does a home with great potential catch your eye, where a fresh coat of paint, a new kitchen, updated flooring, or a few new fixtures lets you put your own stamp on the space while living in it?

Of course, each option comes with different costs. Move-in ready or newly built homes often carry a higher price tag upfront, but they save you time, effort, and renovation expenses later. Homes that need a little TLC may require more work (and patience), but they can be more affordable initially and offer opportunities to build equity through your updates.

From a realtor’s perspective, it’s all about balancing convenience, cost, and long-term value. Updated or new homes give you immediate comfort and less planning, while homes that need minor updates allow you to personalize, increase equity over time, and make your dream home truly yours.

Arlington’s neighborhoods offer the perfect mix of classic charm and modern upgrades, so whichever route you choose, you’re investing in a beautiful, vibrant community.

Which one would you go for—move-in ready or a home you can shape along the way?
Here are some active listings to explore both options!

THIS: Fully Updated & Ready to Move In (more…)


This is a sponsored column by attorneys John Berry and Kimberly Berry of Berry & Berry, PLLC, an employment and labor law firm located in Northern Virginia that specializes in federal employee, security clearance, retirement and private sector employee matters.

We defend federal employees facing discipline. Federal employees serve the public with dedication, but like any workforce, they may face proposed disciplinary actions, ranging from demotions to removals. These actions are stressful and career-threatening, but federal law and regulations provide employees with meaningful rights and avenues to respond. As lawyers representing federal employees, it is important to understand the federal employee disciplinary process.

The disciplinary process, for most federal employees, is currently on hold during the Government Shutdown, but will resume as soon as federal employees are permitted to return to work.

Understanding the Notice of Proposed Discipline

When an agency intends to discipline most federal employees, it must first issue a written Notice of Proposed Discipline (e.g. Notice of Proposed Removal). This document outlines the charges, specifications, and the proposed penalty. Importantly, this is not the final decision. It is just a proposed action. At this stage, the employee (presuming they are not probationary or in a unique civil service category) generally has the right to respond both orally and in writing.

What to Consider in Reviewing the Proposal?

When reviewing the Proposed Discipline, it is important to look for a few things in evaluating it, including:

  • Specificity of Charges: Does the notice clearly identify the alleged misconduct?
  • Evidence Cited: Is the proposed action supported by reliable documentation or testimony?
  • Penalty Proposed: Does the penalty align with the agency’s own disciplinary table and other similar cases?

The Employee’s Right to Respond

Federal employees generally have the right to respond, usually within 7 to 30 days depending on the severity of the proposed action and the agency involved. This is a critical window to:

  • Request and Review the Evidence – Request the information upon which the notice is based.
  • Refute Allegations – Challenge inaccuracies or incomplete facts in the notice.
  • Provide Mitigation – Explain extenuating circumstances, work history, or personal factors that weigh against severe discipline.
  • Highlight Other Issues – Agencies must follow law and regulations. Many disciplinary cases also involve discrimination and/or whistleblower retaliation which is relevant to a federal employee’s defense.

Often, agencies fail to consider mitigating factors such as years of good service, lack of prior discipline, or whether progressive discipline was properly applied at the proposal stage. These arguments can substantially reduce or eliminate penalties in the final decision.

The Deciding Official’s Role

A deciding official, separate from the proposing official, will hear the employee’s response and issue the final decision. The deciding official is required to give meaningful consideration to the employee’s defense. Ensuring that the response is written carefully, supported by evidence, and persuasive is crucial. It is also important for a federal employment attorney to prepare a federal employee for the oral response.

Appealing a Final Decision

If the agency issues an adverse action (such as removal, suspension over 14 days, or demotion), the employee may have the right to appeal. Options include:

Each forum has strict deadline, often as short as 30 days, so employees should seek a federal employment lawyer immediately after receiving the final decision.

Why Legal Representation is Important

Defending against proposed discipline is not just about challenging allegations. It requires legal representation, for such things as:

  • Reviewing agency evidence and uncovering weaknesses.
  • Gathering witness statements and supporting documents.
  • Framing mitigation in a way that resonates with deciding officials.
  • Preparing for potential appeals to MSPB or arbitration.

An experienced federal employment attorney can significantly improve outcomes, whether by securing withdrawal of the proposal, negotiating a lesser penalty, or successfully overturning an adverse decision on appeal.

Conclusion

Federal employees facing proposed disciplinary actions should remember: the notice is not a final decision. With well-prepared responses and counsel, many employees successfully defend their careers. The process is complex, but due process protections exist for a reason. Federal employees should have a federal employment lawyer retained to assist them in this process.

Our law firm represents and advises federal employees in various employment law matters. If you need legal assistance regarding a federal employment matter, please contact our office at (703) 668-0070 or at www.berrylegal.com to schedule a consultation.


This column is sponsored by Arlington Arts/Arlington Cultural Affairs, a division of Arlington Economic Development.

South Arlington’s neighborhoods were undoubtedly fertile ground for women musicians of color. The area was home to both the legendary vocalist and pianist Roberta Flack as well as the International Sweethearts of Rhythm, an all-female, multi-ethnic big band that toured to national acclaim in the 1930’s and 40’s. Now, two contemporary women musicians uplift the legacies of these Arlington legends with a weekend showcase at Theatre on the Run, at 3700 S. Four Mile Run Drive, in Arlington.

The world premiere of Suite for Sweethearts by Amy K Bormet takes place on Friday, Oct. 3, 2025 (shows at 7:00 and 9:00 p.m.). The following evening hear Killing Me Softly: A Love Letter to Roberta Flack by vocalist Munit Mesfin and the First Take Band on Saturday, Oct. 4, 2025 at 9:00 p.m. (Mesfin’s 7:00 p.m. show is already sold out). Reservations for this FREE event are available on Eventbrite.

Additionally, Bormet and Mesfin will each offer youth-oriented presentations at the same location on Sunday, Oct. 5. Bringing Flack’s children’s book, The Green Piano to life via an interactive performance, Munit and z Lovebugs Celebrate Roberta, Music and You! occurs at 11:00 a.m. Amy K Bormet offers an improvisation workshop for all experience levels (Age 14+) at 2:00 p.m. Bormet also offers a free Open Rehearsal, Wednesday Oct. 1 (8:00 – 10:00 p.m.).

Suite for Sweethearts by Amy K Bormet.
At the height of the Swing Era, a racially integrated women’s big band called the International Sweethearts of Rhythm attracted the finest women jazz instrumentalists and toured to national acclaim in the 1930s and 40s. From 1942 through 1949, the band’s home base was at 908 S. Quinn St. (no longer extant). Inspired by their journey, Ms. Bormet has composed a suite of new music for her large ensemble, Bitter Sweethearts. In addition to the performance, the rehearsals of “Suite for Sweethearts,” will be open to the public in the Theatre on the Run. The project will include a zine of photos and memorabilia from the Washington Women in Jazz Archives and the International Sweethearts of Rhythm collection at the Smithsonian American History Museum.

Amy K Bormet is a performer, composer and director who tours the U.S., Europe, South America and Asia. Amy was an artist-in-residence for Betty Carter Jazz Ahead, and a Mary Lou Williams Emerging Artist at the John F. Kennedy Center. An advocate for women musicians, Amy is the founder and artistic director of the Washington Women in Jazz Festival. Her 17-piece jazz orchestra, Celestial Spang-A-Lang, co-led with Baritone Saxophonist Dr. Leigh Pilzer, premiered at the Atlas Performing Arts Center for the Washington Women in Jazz Festival in March 2023. A proud graduate of D.C.’s Duke Ellington School of the Arts and Howard University, Amy is the chair of the alumni board at University of Michigan School of Music, Theater and Dance where she studied with Geri Allen.

Killing Me Softly: A Love Letter to Roberta Flack by Munit Mesfin

Using both original compositions as well as music from Flack’s cannon, Munit Mesfin and the First Take Band convey the story of the five-time Grammy-award winning musician. Flack, who passed away on Feb. 24, 2025, lived her formative years in Arlington’s historically African American Green Valley neighborhood. She attended the Hoffman-Boston High School where she was voted “Most Musical”! This project will celebrate Roberta Flack’s place in Arlington’s history using her music, her social justice activism, and her children’s book for a multi-generational, multi-disciplinary experience. Munit had the tremendous honor of having played for Roberta Flack at her apartment in New York in 2023 and 2024.

Munit Mesfin is an award-winning Ethiopian American singer, songwriter, teaching artist, MC and a Pan-African who uses her art to advocate for peace, human rights and justice. Munit has performed in Ethiopia, Egypt, South Africa, Germany, Spain and across the U.S. Regionally she has appeared at the Smithsonian National Museum for African Art, the Kennedy Center, Mr. Henry’s and Blues Alley. She has been featured on Voice of America, SABC in South Africa and Deutschewelle Radio among other media outlets. Mesfin loves creating community through music for all ages in her own soul, jazz or reggae band, with her children as Munit and z Lovebugs and through the global music collective, Project Locrea!

Arlington Arts received one of the top-ranking awards from the National Endowment for the Arts American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) grant. It then launched a competitive Artists In Residence (AIR) Grant which awarded grants to four different artists. The winning artists-in-residence included: the two performing artists in the upcoming showcase — Jazz musician Amy K Bormet, and vocalist Munit Mesfin (Sefanit Mesfin-Champagne); visual artist MasPaz (Federico Frum) and visual artist Adam Henry. The work of the two visual arts winners will be realized over the coming year.


This article is written and sponsored by Arlington Economic Development.

Hispanic Heritage Month is a time to celebrate the rich cultural legacy and entrepreneurial spirit of Hispanic communities across the United States. In Arlington, that spirit is reflected in the vibrant network of Hispanic-owned businesses that continue to shape our local economy and community identity.

This year, BizLaunch is proud to celebrate under the national theme “Collective Heritage: Honoring the Past, Inspiring the Future” as a tribute to the legacy of long-standing businesses and the promise of emerging entrepreneurs redefining success in our region.

Among the Hispanic-owned businesses that have become pillars of Arlington’s neighborhoods are:

  • Amoroso Art: A vibrant creative studio celebrating Latin American culture through visual arts
  • Island Jewelry: Known for its handcrafted pieces that reflect Caribbean heritage and craftsmanship
  • Panamerican Bakery: Brings the warmth of traditional Latin baked goods to the community
  • Heads Up Hair Design: Offers personalized beauty services rooted in cultural pride and style
  • La Coop Coffee: A social enterprise connecting Guatemalan coffee growers with local consumers;
  • Café Sazón and Cassiel Salon: Community favorites blending hospitality and wellness, creating welcoming spaces that reflect the diversity and entrepreneurial spirit of Arlington’s Hispanic community

These businesses are part of a broader movement in Arlington, Virginia and beyond. Across Virginia, Hispanic entrepreneurs own more than 9.2 percent of small businesses, contributing significantly to the state’s economic growth . Nationally, there are more than 5.1 million Hispanic-owned firms employing nearly three million people and generating over $766.8 billion in annual revenue. Hispanic business owners currently represent 14.5 percent of all entrepreneurs in the United States, a figure that continues to grow each year (U.S. Small Business Administration, 2024). Hispanic-owned businesses have experienced remarkable growth, increasing by 44% between 2018 and 2023, compared to a slight decline in white-owned businesses during the same period. This surge highlights the dynamic expansion of Latino entrepreneurship in the U.S. (Stanford GSB, 2024).

But Hispanic Heritage Month is not only about honoring the past. It is also about inspiring the future. Arlington is home to a new generation of Hispanic entrepreneurs who are launching innovative ventures and bringing fresh energy to our business landscape. These early-stage businesses, such as Red Bean Harvest Coffee, a specialty coffee startup connecting local consumers with Latin American growers; Prize App, a creative platform that benefits employees and employers at the same time; Tech Solutions by Alexis Rivas, providing tech support and digital services to small businesses; and Portal Maya Food Truck, serving traditional Mayan flavors with a modern twist, are full of promise, and their stories are just beginning.[DE8]

(more…)


This regularly scheduled sponsored column is written by Eli Tucker, Arlington-based Realtor and Arlington resident. If you would like to work with Eli and his team in Northern Virginia and the greater D.C. Metro area, you can reach him directly at [email protected].

I’d like to share some exciting personal news with the ARLnow community… our family of three just became a family of four!

We welcomed baby girl Summer Tucker into the world in the early hours of September 21, the last day of Summer! We had the name picked out well before, so her birth date was a fun coincidence.

Summer is healthy, Mom is well, brother is excited, and we are enjoying every minute of it.

Baby girl Summer Tucker

If you’d like to discuss buying, selling, investing, or renting, don’t hesitate to reach out to me at [email protected].

We have access to the most pre and off-market listings across the DMV of any brokerage and are happy to share what’s available with anybody who asks.

Below are some of our team’s pre/off-market listings, details and additional listings available by request:

  • Ballston – 4BR/3.5BA+office/4,000 sqft – Four Townhouses (2026/2027) – 11th St N Arlington VA 22201
  • Falls Church City – 4BR/4.5BA/3,000+ sqft – End-unit townhouse (1995) – Rees Pl Falls Church VA 22046
  • Rosslyn – 2BR+den/2.5BA/2,000+ sqft – Condo (2021) – 1781 N Pierce St Arlington VA 22209
  • Highland Park/Overlee Knolls – 6BR/5.5BA/5,000+ sqft – Detached Single Family (2025) – 22nd Rd N Arlington VA 22205

Eli and his team believe that your real estate needs should be managed by advisors, not salespeople. Their mission is to guide, educate, and advocate for their clients through real advice, hands-on support, and personalized service.


This recurring Real Estate feature is sponsored by The Eli Residential Team. Their mission is to guide, educate, and advocate for their clients through real advice, hands-on support, and personalized service. This week’s post is written by Jean Ropp

Last month, I shared a handful of homes that, “should have sold by now.” This month, I’ve found another round of properties that, if we were looking back just a few years, would likely have been snapped up in a heartbeat.

It’s important to note that by definition, we’re still in a seller’s market. Inventory remains low, and we’re not near the levels that would signal a true buyer’s market. And if we rewind to pre-pandemic times, it was normal for a home to be on the market for a few weeks. Sellers didn’t worry if their listing didn’t disappear in three days.

But after the last four years of intense frenzied demand, we’ve gotten used to a new pace where anything less than lightning-fast feels unusual. So when I say these homes “should have sold by now,” it’s only in the context of that recent precedent.

The properties I’m highlighting below are well-prepared, appealing listings. Today, they’re still available, giving buyers a rare window of opportunity.

2727 N George Mason Dr
  • 2016 N Adams St #604
    1 Bed | 1 Bath
    Presented by: RLAH @properties (RLAH3)
    Price: $295,000
    Days on Market: 20
  • 2903 S Woodstock St #B
    3 Bed | 2.5 Bath
    Presented by: EXP Realty, LLC
    Price: $549,900
    Days on Market: 25
  • 4855 27th Rd S
    2 Bed | 2 Bath
    Presented by: EXP Realty, LLC
    Price: $599,900
    Days on Market: 26
  • 2001 15th St N #1210
    2 Bed | 2 Bath
    Presented by: Central Properties, LLC
    Price: $799,000
    Days on Market: 26
  • 2801 Langston Blvd #302
    2 Bed | 2 Bath
    Presented by: Corcoran McEnearney
    Price: $799,000
    Days on Market: 27
  • 5713 19th St N
    3 Bed | 3 Bath
    Presented by: Long & Foster Real Estate, Inc.
    Price: $998,000
    Days on Market: 25
  • 630 N Edison St
    3 Bed | 2 Bath
    Presented by: Compass
    Price: $1,275,000
    Days on Market: 26
  • 2566 Military Rd
    4 Bed | 3 Bath
    Presented by: TTR Sotheby’s International Realty
    Price: $1,299,900
    Days on Market: 25
  • 322 N George Mason Dr
    5 Bed | 4.5 Bath
    Presented by: Long & Foster Real Estate, Inc.
    Price: $1,450,000
    Days on Market: 24
  • 2727 N George Mason Dr
    5 Bed | 5.5 Bath
    Presented by: Corcoran McEnearney
    Price: $1,795,000
    Days on Market: 25

If you would like to tour any of these homes please reach out to me to book a private showing, Jean Ropp, [email protected] or 781.635.5530


This sponsored column is by Law Office of James Montana PLLC. All questions about it should be directed to James Montana, Esq. and Janice Chen, Esq., practicing attorneys at The Law Office of James Montana PLLC, an immigration-focused law firm located in Falls Church, Virginia. The legal information given here is general in nature. If you want legal advice, contact us for an appointment.

On Friday, September 19, 2025, the Trump Administration published a Proclamation – “Restriction on Entry of Certain Non-Immigrant Workers” – which purported to impose a $100,000 ‘supplemental fee’ on all petitions, with the penalty being that visas – that is, entry documents provided by the US Embassies and consulates abroad – would not be issued for any beneficiary of a petition for which the supplemental fee had not been paid. The Proclamation did not explain whether this $100,000 ‘supplemental fee’ applied only to prospective H-1B petitions or to current petitions. The plain text of the Proclamation suggested that it applied to all H-1B workers “currently outside the United States” as of 12:01 AM EST on September 21, 2025. Therefore, every H-1B visaholder who happened to be outside the U.S. on September 19th had excellent reason to panic. Corporations, including Google, and Amazon, reacted rationally by telling their workers to drop everything and fly home, pronto.

On Saturday, September 20, 2025, USCIS Director Joseph B. Edlow published a one-page memorandum that walked back the worst elements of the Proclamation. It clarified matters, at least to a degree, by stating that the proclamation “only applies prospectively to petitions that have not yet been filed” and not to current H-1B visaholders. On Sunday, September 21, 2025, the Department of State and Customs and Border Protection released similar clarifications.

The result of this haphazard rollout was – predictably – chaos, which sparked criticism across the ideological spectrum, from Steve Bannon to tech industry trade groups. Even the attempts to reassure current H-1B visaholders fell flat, because – incredibly – the Administration appears not to have decided yet whether the $100,000 surcharge is annual or once every three years, or whether it applies to changes of employer outside the annual lottery process.

This chaos managed to overshadow another massive change to the H-1B process – a notice of proposed regulatory action, by which the Administration is seeking to eliminate the current H-1B lottery, which allocates visas randomly so long as the proposed employment meets the threshold qualifications and does not fall the prevailing wages observed by the Department of Labor. In its place, the Administration is seeking to create a ‘weighted’ system which prioritizes positions that are being paid at higher than the prevailing wage. Note that, unlike the 2021 proposed revisions, this new proposed system doesn’t prioritize the highest-wage positions, as an absolute matter, but rather prioritizes those positions with the greatest difference between the wage offered to the foreign employee and the prevailing wage. If the prevailing wage for legal secretaries is $50,000 per year and you offer to pay a foreign legal secretary $150,000 per year, the new weighted lottery system prioritizes your application over an application for a foreign AI researcher who earns much more.

It’s difficult to say why the Administration rolled out the new $100,000 surcharge in this way. It seems likely that the speed of the rollout was intentional; if the Administration had provided even two weeks’ notice, companies would have rushed to file new applications before the deadline. But, given that intentionality, it is hard to understand why the Administration didn’t foresee the inevitable consequences of sloppy drafting – in cost, heartache, and legal bills – and work to prevent them.

Who was at fault for this? We’ll have to wait for the memoirs and tell-alls to be released. The official White House ‘Rapid Response 47’ Twitter account offered an interesting theory: “Corporate lawyers and others with agendas are creating a lot of FAKE NEWS around President Trump’s H-1B Proclamation.”

The White House didn’t mean to include Statutes of Liberty in its criticism, and properly so. We don’t traffic in fake news. We’re real advertisers.

Readers are, as always, invited to ask questions, real or fake,, and we will do our best to respond.


View More Stories